9.04 Cultural Influences
The film provenance of
Exploding Cinema has been discussed earlier from what might be called a
cultural history perspective. With oral history we can gain insight into
another form of historical provenance which is embedded in the family histories
of the participants. This shows how cultural forms reproduce themselves and are
coloured by a collective amalgam of personal experiences as well as being
formed from more diffuse cultural forces. The early influences of the
Collective were reported as being via books, television, home movie or slide
shows, Saturday morning children's film clubs and drive-in cinemas.
But one influence stood out as going much further
back. This is Duncan Reekie's remarkable family connection with a famous star
of the musichall, Little Tich.
A
relative was Little Tich, the Great Little TichÉ Little Tich was a very famous
comedian and musichall performer whose act consisted of wearing shoes that had
very, very long built-up sections at the front. This would allow him to lean
forwards slightly and then more, and more, and more, until he was leaning
forwards at a completely untenable angle! (Laughing) Then he'd be able to stand
back up again. And then the other thing he did was he would dance on these big
shoes and sort of do some very strange dances. And then, he would jump up and
stand on them, like almost stilts or something. (DR)[1]
The influence of books was varied and ranged from
second-hand non-fiction to hip existential classics of the Sixties (read in the
Seventies).[2]
I
lived in the suburbs like all Australians do, and it was very boring. I was
reading English comics all the time. I just wanted to be in England all the
timeÉ I loved books but my family didn't do any reading at all. I don't know
what they did - they are all very shady. I used to like archaeology and science
and stuff like that. From an early age I used to go to the library and read
loads and loads of non-fictionÉ The house was full of junk. It is a very nice
sort of Sixties house, but it is full of old Victorian rubbish. My dad collects
books everywhere, (and old sewing machines and everything), it is just piled
high. Its like the Adams Family house. (CK)
I
suppose books were my main influence when I was a kid, rather than film. I read
an awful lot of existentialist literature when I was about 16 - 19 that I think
had quite an affect of me, I read all the Sartre trilogy and lots of Samuel
Beckett and KafkaÉ I read a lot of trash as well, a lot of Tolkein Novels. The
Tolkein craze was definitely part of that. (JT)
The core collective members were born into the heyday
of Television. They were part of the first television generation. By the
mid-Sixties to early Seventies television had saturated the population and the
content had got beyond the naivety of the Fifties.
I
was always a real TV addict, and films as well really. My parents are quite
old, so I grew up with watching old films with them, and really being immersed
in old film culture, and knowing all the names of the actors and actresses from
the Thirties onwards, and directors. I used to like gangster films, and
musicals, just anything old. Anything made before 1970 I really like, the same
with books. (CK)
I
loved Science Fiction things on TV. Things that I really remember are things
like Dr Who, and The Tomorrow People, a slightly spooky children's science fiction
series. I was a complete addict for that, both me and my brother. Lost in
Space, all those things. (JT)
I
remember seeing colour television for the first time, being taken to see it by
my father and being quite amazed. But no, we had a black and white one. Things
like Department S would be a favourite programme of mine - it was very strange.
It was like a camp Seventies version of The X Files, which was much stranger
than The X Files. There was a character in it called Jason King played by Peter
Wingard, and he then got his own series. There was another very strange
programme I used to like called Ace of Wands which was about a kind of hippie
warlock detective. That was in the Seventies as well. They should revive that.
There were a few very strange attempts to have a counter cultural pulp sort of
genre, hippie detectives and things, which were quite interesting. But I used
to watch everything. I was very omnivorousÉ I never thought I was going to be a
filmmaker particularly but I just used to watch TV all the time. (DR)
I have discussed the importance of home movies to
the underground style in general and as a framework from which to understand
the oral cultural frame that surrounds Exploding Cinema.[3]
The biographical experiences suggest that 35mm slide shows may have been more
ubiquitous than Super 8 film in the Sixties.[4]
The experiences of both reveal important similarities with the Exploding Cinema
format. From the ever present whirring of the projector to the audience
interjections and close connection with the subject matter on screen.[5]
It
would be like a family get togetherÉ with about fifteen or eighteen people. A
lot of the events would be embarrassing moments with the children, and everyone
would scream with laughter. My brother being forced to hold a chicken by my dad
and crying was always a favouriteÉ But I think it is the darkened room, whirly
projectors, sort of thing - and the breaking, snapping, smoke coming out, that
sort of thing, which is very much like the Exploding Cinema really, in lots of
ways. (CK)
(Dad)
took loads and loads of slides, mostly holiday pictures, from quite an early
ageÉ We had very formal, very exciting slide shows, where all the lights would
go down. We would have sandwiches and crisps and we would watch ourselves in
Lake Windermere or whateverÉ It was nice and kind of tedious at the same time -
it seemed to be the thing you did in those days, and I know a lot of my friends
that did that as well. If you didn't have cine-cameras, that is what you did.
You made it a bit like a cinema, you put the lights down and you projected the
slides. So, yes, I have got a very fond attitude to slides, you know, slide
projection and that idea of reliving memories through slides. (JT)[6]
Home movies and slides also provided the first experience
of film making, both taking pictures whether movie or slide and of course all
the different modes of being 'caught' on camera.
My
dad used to shoot pictures from the 1940s, on Standard 8 and then on Super 8.
He was always getting us to come outside and take pictures of us, films of us.
Which was a lot of us walking towards the camera all the time. So I grew up
with someone who was always taking photos. You could hear him say, 'Walk
towards the camera'. And we would say, 'Oh God! Do we have to?' I really hated
itÉ There is a record of all six children doing that, all of us walking towards
the cameraÉ But they are just such beautiful (images)É (CK)
Next there were the experiences of watching proper
mainstream movies that were outside of the norm of darkened space and passive
seated audience. First there was the common young person's experience of the
Saturday morning 'flicks'.[7]
Another form of movie presentation that challenges
the dominant cinemas normative mode is the drive-in. The spectacle and
informality of drive-ins could have been an influence on Exploding Cinema. I
have already noted how the drive-in heralded the new B Movie genres of Horror
and Rock in the Fifties.[8]
Put these experiences together and you can
practically reconstruct an entire Exploding Cinema show from them. The mixture
of influences implies the cultural background of the collective was close to a
working or lower middle class, but not a typical working class, cultural
experience. The culture of the lower classes cannot be reduced to its
stereotypes of popular culture, especially after the opening up of tertiary
education and its associated intellectual aspirations to the masses from the
Sixties.[10]
In
my adolescence I started to watch seasons of Jean Luc Goddard and Bunuel films
and my dad was kind of interested in Bunuel because of the Spanish connections.
Jean Luc Goddard, yeah, I was so bowled over, because he combines literary
interests with all these elements of anthropology and sociology but with trash
genre narratives and just great visual motifs and, so many different
influences. (He) wasn't just like a filmmaker he was like a film maker/ writer/
poster maker, and polemicist. I was just so excited even (though I was just)
watching those things on TVÉ
Then
I started going to art cinemasÉ The Everyman mostly, also The Scala and The
Ritzy and... When I eventually moved to London I would probably be going about
twice a week and often one of those visits would be to see a double or a triple
bill, so I'd probably go and see about five or six films a week. (PT)
From these early stirrings of interest in film there
were still barriers to be crossed before the idea that films could actually be
made, rather than simply consumed, was internalised. Not least of these
barriers was internalised sexism.
I
was always interested in film makingÉ but I was a technophobeÉ I was quite
nervous about filmmaking. I think its definitely a gender thing. My father and
brother were the scientists and me and my mother, we didn't change a light
bulb, you know what I meanÉ They did everything. There was a big gender
differentiation of technology and I saw film technology and I thoughtÉ I was
nervous of it. One of the ways that Exploding Cinema was a big inspiration to
me was that I saw the way people fiddling with Super Eight. (JT)
Of
course men are also infected with lack of confidence and this may be especially
true of lower class men. Experimental film could be a way for the social
outsider to see what was possible. Here is Paul Tarrago's first encounter with
Maya Deren.
As
I left college (doing Spanish) I started going to loads of evening classesÉ
That's where I started seeing a lot of work that I'd only vaguely read about -
both experimental and art cinema. Like Maya Deren's film 'Meshes of the Afternoon'. The first time I saw that
I just thought, 'Wow!'. I could see how you could do it, it wasn't unbearably
complex, and it wasn't exclusive. Even though it was made about forty-five
years before I'd seen it, I could see a way in. I could imagine making it,
which was really exciting. I'd read about how she'd made it as well, so that
made it even more possible. At the same time I was going to these classes and
learning how to operate film equipment and thinking 'Yeah I can do this', so
that's how I started making films. But I was kind of quite overwhelmed by the
usual thing of self-doubt so I didn't really progress in the way I would have
believed that I would have progressed as a film maker. -
Another sort of barrier to making films was disillusionment
with the art world or the film industry as a context for work.
At
college I got a little disillusioned with the art world, with the workings of
the art worldÉ The best thing that can happen to you is to become a famous
artist. And then you have to deal with all the 'having to sell yourself'. (TZ)
Even once radical organisations become
institutionalised and even unworkable in their later years as Duncan Reekie
found:
I
learned about the way the film industry worked and the way that the funding organisations
worked. And I started to meet a lot of people who were involved in the funding
organisations or who were involved in so-called political film making, or
oppositional film making, or whatever you want to call it, and independent film
making. And I began to become very disenchanted with the whole thing and I
began to realise that, if you were going to make political films, then you had
to rethink the project, the project had to be totally rethought.
I'd
been going round slagging off the (London) Film Co-op for quite a long time on
very little evidence and people started to say to me, 'Well, how can you slag
off the Filmmakers' Co-op when you don't know anything about it?' So I went and
worked voluntarily at the Film Co-op for three or four months and it was just
really a miserable experienceÉ I became involved in the Co-op politics and the
collective politics, the democratic politics that was going on. And basically
it was infighting and horrible personality clashes. And it basically confirmed
all my worst prejudices, (which was very gratifying)".[12]
(DR)
A similar experience can be
got from the commercial world as Colette Rouhier found:
[1] Little Tich (1869-1928) was one of the great legends
of music hall who was at his peak in the 1890's. Little Tich, aka Harry Relph,
was just four feet high. He was most famous for his dance with 28-inch long
boots on. The boots are now displayed in the Blacksmiths Arms in his home
village of Cudham in Kent. See Little Tich, Giant of the Music Hall by Mary Tich and Richard Findlater (Elm Tree Books,
London 1979). Hear him on 'The Glory of Music Hall Vol. 3' (Flapper
PACSCD-9476), 'Gems of the Music Hall' (Flapper PASTCD-7005) and 'Golden Years
of Music Hall' (Saydisc SDL-380).
[2] This was the first period of history in which books
became ubiquitous and easily obtained very cheaply second hand, often being
thrown away or sold at jumble sales.
[4] Another important home media mentioned by Jenet Thomas
in her interview is her dad's experiments with a reel to reel audio 'tape
recorder'.
[5] Of course 35mm slides are the main materials of the
distinctive Exploding Cinema 'dŽcor'. These were also known as colour
transparencies.
[6] "From about eight, me and my brother had little
cameras, and they were Instamatic cameras and we documented everything - mostly
holidays, but also pets". Jenet Thomas interview.
[7] 'Saturday morning flicks' is the slang from my own
youth in the Fifties. There were also Saturday afternoon matinees. See
Seeing in the Dark, edited by Ian
Breakwell and Paul Hamond (Serpents Tail, 1990).
[9] "We moved to Durban and for a short while had a
house that over-looked a drive-in. We used to sit and watch the movies from our
balcony". (CR)
[10] See Jonathan Rose's monumental The Intellectual
Life of the British Working Classes
(Yale U.P. 2001)
[12] Duncan's involvement with the London Filmmaker's Coop
was in early 1991.
[13] Either by giving direct access to the most expressive
and creative processes of filmmaking or by giving them a platform and
collective support from which to be critical of the system that had oppressed
them.
[14] At the time of writing (2001) people had found
different solutions to the career problem: Thomas trained as a projectionist
and is working at the Ritzy; Colette trained in web design and teaches video
and design in a College of Further Education; Duncan was completing a Ph.D. at
Falmouth Art College, Jenet and Paul both teach part-time and are focused on
their film making. A newer member Damon, who joined after the interview period,
works in Soho as a DVD technician in the post-production industry. Caroline
Kennedy was last seen selling 'space hoppers' at a stall in Spitalfields
Market.